Fueling Success: Ending the Tug-of-War Between Supply and Logistics

Provided by Gravitate

A Story of Two Teams

Meet Sarah. She’s a Supply Analyst, and her screen looks like the matrix—a sea of numbers representing fuel prices, market trends, and arbitrage opportunities. This morning, she found a golden opportunity: a supplier 90 miles away is selling gasoline for twenty cents less per gallon. By her calculations, rerouting four trucks will save the company thousands. She figures that they can pull one truck from the southern terminal and three from the north. If they can pay one driver overtime and start another driver early, they should be able to swing it. She drafts the plan and sends it over. It’s complex, but it’s optimal.

Now, meet Mike. He’s the Dispatch Manager, and his phone hasn’t stopped ringing. One driver is stuck in traffic, another is reporting a two-hour wait at a terminal, and a key site is projected to run out of fuel in 45 minutes. Then, Sarah’s “optimal” plan comes in. Drive 90 miles? That adds three hours of transit time, blows up his driver schedules, and the “cheaper” fuel will be a lot less valuable if sites run dry. For Mike, Sarah’s plan isn’t optimal; it’s impossible.

This is the daily tug-of-war in the fuel industry. Supply pulls towards complexity to find savings, while Logistics pulls towards predictability to make execution possible. They share the same goal—profitability—but their opposing perspectives create a constant, costly friction.

Bridging the Gap

The biggest misconception is that the ‘other side’ doesn’t care about profitability. That’s simply not true. Supply sees profit in cents-per-gallon saved through day deals and arb capture. Logistics sees profit in operational efficiency—fewer deadhead miles, no runouts, and happy customers. The problem is that their tools and data are siloed, so they can’t see how their decisions impact each other’s ability to generate that profit. They’re not working against each other; they’re working in the dark.

One of the most successful strategies industry leaders are employing to solve this problem is a shared data platform. It turns on the lights for everyone. It creates a single source of truth. Suddenly, the supply team’s ‘optimal’ plan is automatically layered with the real-world constraints from logistics. And the logistics team can see the ‘why’ behind a specific sourcing decision. It reframes the conversation from “Your plan is impossible” to “I see the goal; let’s look at the data together and find the best achievable option.”

4 Benefits of a Shared Platform

A shared dispatch solution does more than just show data; it changes how teams fundamentally work together.

  1. Real-Time Visibility and Collaboration. Leading platforms provide a “single pane of glass” view. Best-buy engines show every terminal in a radius, not just as a price on a spreadsheet, but with real-time wait times and inventory levels. When Supply and Logistics look at the same live map, the optimal choice becomes obvious to both.
  2. Dynamic, Data-Driven Strategies. Static spreadsheets are obsolete the moment they’re published. A shared platform allows supply strategies to be dynamic. The system can instantly calculate the true laid-in price, factoring in the extra drive time and fuel cost. This allows Supply to build variability into their plans, empowering Logistics to make the smartest call on the fly.
  3. Futureproofing with Historical Analysis. The platform becomes a treasure trove of data. You can finally track and quantify missed opportunities. Why did you have to deviate from the plan? How much money was left on the table? By analyzing this shared data, teams can make powerful, evidence-based decisions for the future—like hiring more drivers, optimizing routes, or diversifying suppliers.
  4. Building a Unified Culture. Technology underpins culture. When both teams operate from the same playbook, it fosters feedback, understanding, and shared goals. It allows you to create metrics and reward systems that benefit everyone. Success is no longer defined by one team “winning” over the other, but by the entire operation hitting its profitability targets together.

Conclusions

The daily tug-of-war between Supply and Logistics isn’t a necessary cost of doing business; it’s a data problem with a clear solution. By moving from siloed spreadsheets to a shared, dynamic platform, you transform the entire operation. Conflict gives way to collaboration, impossible plans become achievable profits, and the friction that burns through margins is replaced by a unified strategy. It’s time to stop choosing between saving cents and saving the schedule, and start building a supply chain engineered to deliver both.

Other Articles of Interest